I mentally divide discussion of novels into three stages, though  there is often overlap, depending on the novel. The first stage is  acclimation, when we're figuring out what's going on. The second stage  is the deepening of analysis, when we talk about narrative techniques  and themes. The final stage is resolution.
The three biggest elements of a novel are characters, setting, and conflict, and these are the foci of the first stage.
An  activity I often do on the first day is to list all the characters on  the board and ask for an adjective for each. Sometimes I will put the  students into groups and ask them to "cast" the film adaptation of the  novel and explain why they chose a particular actor for a role. At this  stage we're trying to figure out how the characters relate to each  other, what each character wants, and what stands in the way. [I do the  same thing for drama.]
What's the setting? What do we  already know about this time or place, outside of what the novel tells  us? What attitude does the narration take toward the setting? How do the  characters engage with technologies? How do the characters fit into the  setting? Is the setting part of their identity? Is it part of the  conflict? I often have students draw a map at this stage, though not  usually on the first day. I have had students draw maps of Robinson  Crusoe's island and of Audley Court, and I have had them trace Jonathan  Harker's journey through Europe (a first-day activity).
What  are the conflicts? Conflicts are usually, but not always, centered in  character relations. Thinking about conflicts separately from characters  can get students thinking about societal and environmental conflicts.
The  above strategies work well for both fiction and drama. When discussing  fiction, we also need to look at narrative technique, which I usually  save for the middle stage, unless the book has multiple narrators (like Dracula).  Who's the narrator? If it's first-person, why is this person speaking?  What does the speaker reveal about him/herself and others? If it's  third-person, is it omniscient or limited? Does the narrator seem to  have a persona? Does the narrator privilege a point of view? How are  up-close scenes balanced with descriptive scenes in which we get to see  characters in a larger context? When and why does the narrator "zoom in"  or out? How are characters' voices and thoughts represented? Does the  narrator "preach" or philosophize on the situation?
This  middle stage is also when we look closely at quotes that build certain  themes. A good introductory quote activity is to let groups choose a  quote that interests them for whatever reason. Assign each group a  different chapter. Then have them explain what's going on and why they  think the quote is important. (You can then use these quotes on your  exam.)
The final stage is resolution. What sort of closure  is offered? How/ Have characters changed? Have students again give an  adjective for each character and compare the list with the one built on  the first day. What conflicts have been resolved? What conflicts remain,  or what new trouble looms on the horizon? Fun activities at this stage  are (1) to have students create tableaux of important scenes in the  book, (2) create the "reduced" 2-minute version of the book, and (3) to  have a debate about the issues the book was addressing. (These also work  for drama.)
No comments:
Post a Comment